Is barding armour

All discussions related to Warhammer Fantasy Battles from 1st to 8th edition go here, including army construction, comp creation, campaign and scenarios design, etc...
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Prince of Spires
Auctor Aeternitatum
Posts: 8244
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:07 pm
Location: The city of Spires

Is barding armour

#1 Post by Prince of Spires »

Simple question, as the title says. Is barding armour? Everything I can see suggests that it is. Under cavalry (as a troop type), p83, it refers to barding being armour (of the horse).

This left me wondering, since for a cavalry model horse and rider are a single model, then armour for the horse = armour for the rider. But just now I noticed HE mages can take barding as an option for their mounts. And since (BRB p500) if a wizard has an option for armour then he's allowed magical armour, does that allow HE mages to take magical armour?

I can't really see why not. You could argue that it's the horse not the mage that takes the armour. But in the end it does simply add up to the mages armour save. And they are "treated in all respects as a single model" and "it is the riders armour save that is used". So while fluff suggests the armour bits are on the horse, rule wise they belong to the rider. And, there is precedent (of sorts) in the Ogre kingdoms butchers accidentally being able to take iron fists (or whatever they're called).

Then of course, the question becomes why hasn't anyone noticed this earlier?

Rod
For Nagarythe: Come to the dark side.
PS: Bring cookies!

Check out my plog
Painting progress, done/in progress/in box: 167/33/91

Check my writing blog for stories on the Prince of Spires and other pieces of fiction.
User avatar
RE.Lee
Posts: 2618
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: Is barding armour

#2 Post by RE.Lee »

Prince of Spires wrote:You could argue that it's the horse not the mage that takes the armour.
I could and I would :lol: While I understand where you're coming from, I don't think that's not how this rule was intended to work.
cheers, Lee

Elven Field Surgeon, Department of Intensive Care, Resuscitation and Necromancy
User avatar
elendor_f
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 3:08 pm

Re: Is barding armour

#3 Post by elendor_f »

I can't answer for 8th edition, but in 6th the barding of the horse did not prevent the wizard from casting spells, which was the effect of armour on wizards. However the rules never prevented mages from taking magical armor items, it simply mentions that if they did they would be unable to cast any spells at all, unless specified otherwise in the magical item (for example the Radiant Gem of Hoeth allows the wearer to cast spells even if he wears armor).

The reason why I think your reasoning is not true in 8th is that essentially you make the point of having an armour save = having an armour option.
If that is the case, wouldn't simply being mounted allow to take armour items? Since being mounted gives you a 6+ armour save.
I am not sure if in 8th armour prevents mages from casting spells, in 6th this was the main thing preventing mages from taking up armour items (and I think in 7th too).
"The general has this to say about ensuring against defeat when outnumbered, out–weaponed and outpositioned. It is... Don't Have a Battle."
"Sounds like a clever man," said Jenkins.
Terry Pratchett, Jingo!

Avatar: https://silmarillionproject.tumblr.com/
SpellArcher
Green Istari
Posts: 13834
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:26 am
Location: Otherworld

Re: Is barding armour

#4 Post by SpellArcher »

Prince of Spires wrote:p83, it refers to barding being armour (of the horse).
This is the key I guess. I think it can be argued both ways.
Prince of Spires wrote:And, there is precedent (of sorts) in the Ogre kingdoms butchers accidentally being able to take iron fists (or whatever they're called).
Despite Jervis Johnson's intent, the RAW case is just too strong here.
RE.Lee wrote:While I understand where you're coming from, I don't think that's not how this rule was intended to work.
Yeah, the RAI is pretty clear because any number of wizards can ride barded creatures. But the RAW is a little ambiguous.
elendor_f wrote:I am not sure if in 8th armour prevents mages from casting spells
There is no specific rule, this is handled in army selection.

The bottom line for me personally is that I wouldn't be able to write this into a tournament list.
Post Reply