2250 ETC-rules list

This forum is for 7th edition WHFB Army lists.

Moderators: The Heralds, The Loremasters

Post Reply
Message
Author
Aderyn
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:00 pm

2250 ETC-rules list

#1 Post by Aderyn »

Alrite guys so here's the list. Might use this list in a major tournament this spring. C&C are welcome.

Archmage (Death lore) L4
-talisman of saphery
-foliaths robe
-silver wand

Mage L2
-Tricksters Pendant
-Dispel Scroll

Noble (chariotkiller)
-Star Lance
-Talisman of Loec
-Great Eagle
-Dragon armor, Shield

Noble
-bsb Battle banner
-great weapon, dragon armor

2x10 archers

14 swordsmasters
-Full command
-Lion standard

7 Swordsmasters (flankprotector/reserveunit)
-standard - warbanner

14 whitelions (archmage and bsb goes here)
-Full command
-standard of balance

5 Dragon princes
-music

2 RBT's
1 Great Eagle

sums up to 2249p

for more info about ETC-rules read http://swfbr.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2666

first match against the new beastmen army resultet in massacre in my favour.
2250p army 2010 results
Massacres: 4
Solid victory: 2
minor losses: 1
Massacred: 1
PGP
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:31 pm

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#2 Post by PGP »

You could take jewel instead of wand. Lvl 2 can now take double scrolls and the wand. This way you have maximum pd allowed, two scrolls and same amount of spells (higher chance to miss the big spell for lvl4 though). I'd take dragon prince kits for both nobles and switch the war+banner to dp. Smaller sm should take only champion and gem of courage for psych protection. I'd skim everywhere to get a second eagle. 13 sm/wl perform as well as 14 (ToL could be fitted to sm champ). DP:s can manage witout musician. Also nobles can manage with heavy armor.

Actually quite interesting etc-list:
Superman lvl4 with jewel (kryptonite are the magic attack creatures/shooters)
Lvl2+wand+2xscroll
Dp kit battlebanner
Dp kit SL+ToL
2x10 archers
13 fc sm with lion banner
13 fc wl with balance
7 sm with champ and GoC
5 dp with warbannner
2xE
2xrbt

Edit: You probably have to drop the champ from the big sm unit to fit the list to 2.25.
Last edited by PGP on Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SpellArcher
Green Istari
Posts: 13847
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:26 am
Location: Otherworld

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#3 Post by SpellArcher »

Looks pretty sound but a lot in characters IMHO.
Aderyn
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#4 Post by Aderyn »

i know know - i kinda like putting starlance on eagle :P 20" chargerange and the chance to get a badshit crazy bird.

i like how your thinking with the extra powerdice and it struck me aswell, however the tricksters pendant will hopefully kick their ass after i drain magic with my lvl 2 mage. =) It's my way of staying safe against slann with cupped hands (since i get to pick the result NOT killing me >.>) and also daemons which i've come to fear greatly after my last tournament. Not to mention dark elves. :P
2250p army 2010 results
Massacres: 4
Solid victory: 2
minor losses: 1
Massacred: 1
geoguswrek
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:44 pm

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#5 Post by geoguswrek »

The slann can't swap a 5,6, or 2.
DAMN THE VENOM SWORD
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=44127
Aderyn
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#6 Post by Aderyn »

that's funny. because if he misscasts and has to roll twice i might be able choose those numbers for him ;P
2250p army 2010 results
Massacres: 4
Solid victory: 2
minor losses: 1
Massacred: 1
Sashimoto
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:54 am
Location: Russia, Yekaterinburg
Contact:

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#7 Post by Sashimoto »

Why do you take only one scroll?
Aderyn
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: 2250 ETC-rules list

#8 Post by Aderyn »

Sashimoto wrote:
Post subject: Re: 2250 ETC-rules list Reply with quote
Why do you take only one scroll?
I'm not a big fan of scrolls :P
2250p army 2010 results
Massacres: 4
Solid victory: 2
minor losses: 1
Massacred: 1
Post Reply