Future of (High) Elves army
Moderators: The Heralds, The Loremasters
- Swordmaster of Hoeth
- Southern Sentinel
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 9:01 am
- Location: On the path of an outcast
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
I think GW would have been perfectly fine with the 8th edition, regular FAQ release and campaigns such as ET instead of new editions. We just have to wait and see what they really plan, first question being is there 9th edition at all?
Twitter @SwordOfHoeth
High Elves MSU - Observations
Rabidnid wrote:Are you seriously asking someone called Swordmaster of Hoeth why he has more swordmasters than white lions? Really?
-
- Very Helpful Elf
- Posts: 4031
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:10 am
- Location: Patroling the Sea Lanes
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
Wouldn't THAT have been nice.regular FAQ release
- Prince of Spires
- Auctor Aeternitatum
- Posts: 8249
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:07 pm
- Location: The city of Spires
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
Actually, I would already have been happy with just A FAQ release. Regular would have been a bonus...Shannar, Sealord wrote:Wouldn't THAT have been nice.regular FAQ release
You're thinking on too small a scale for the supplements. They (initially) wouldn't be separate kingdoms. They would simply be updated versions of the current HE / DE / WE books. They can then easily sell you an extra book at very little cost to them. With a chance of selling a some extra models you wouldn't otherwise buy.RogueSun wrote: A while back I speculated at something similar when they were first starting to release the sub-codices of armies like the Eldar's Iyanden supplement and the Tau's Farsight supplement. I figured they could easily do something similar to the faction/kingdom breakdown of elves, especially with some of the larger kingdoms. For instance, Caledor could very easily have it's own supplement that puts Dragons as a rare choice, but instead maybe you lose access to Phoenix Guard and Bolt Throwers. While a cool concept and something they could easily do in 9th I'm doubting it'll happen. At least until WHFB makes it's way into a larger money making position.
Picture this scenario. 9th comes out. One of the first books released is WH: Elves. It basically contains the Khaine elven armylist. Perhaps a few units missing here and there. No need for 3 sets of archers of spearmen for instance. Or maybe things like the HE chariots. A lot of elven players would go out and buy that book.
After that, a WH: High Elves army book is released. It contains all units currently in the HE armybook and some separate special rules to set them apart from the generic elves. A bunch of magical items. Some separate fluff. Most current HE players would get that book as well. So now you have sold twice the amount of armybooks. And, as a bonus, the HE player (who also purchased the generic elves book) might just get some other elven models. Because for instance, he always liked treemen and treekin, but didn't want to start a WE army just for them. And now he can use them without issue.
So, twice the books and more models sold and a happy customer. That's a win-win to me.
Rod
For Nagarythe: Come to the dark side.
PS: Bring cookies!
Check out my plog
Painting progress, done/in progress/in box: 167/33/91
Check my writing blog for stories on the Prince of Spires and other pieces of fiction.
PS: Bring cookies!
Check out my plog
Painting progress, done/in progress/in box: 167/33/91
Check my writing blog for stories on the Prince of Spires and other pieces of fiction.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:50 pm
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
Don't think it will happen, unless WFB is again very profitable.
Uniting AB and putting all races in more or less one place is perfect way to cut down cost. Instead of 3 ABs they will have one (they save a lot of money on development, artwork, publishing on one hand and on the other hand they have guarantee that a lot of players will buy it). If it;s huge AB like ET book they could put hardcover preorder and hen release softcover according to demand.
Also new players will buy the book instantly as they can make many armies out of it. I don't trust GW much in terms of balance, but maybe they can playtest new rules so synergies between units will encourage players to field almost all-HE armies, WE armies etc.
Also minis - they save a lot of money also, just looking at the current range, if they release Warhammer:Elves as huge two part book + magic cards + wave of models :
- new plastic archers (to make WE-HE archers)
- new plastic cavalery (SH, Glade Riders, Ellyrian Reavers)
- new mage/hero set (to make HE,WE,DE heroes)
- swordmasters/wardancers kit.
= tons of money.
Also it will enable them to release new rules more frequently so WE or Bretonia players wouldn't have to wait decades for new ABs being a part of huge AB.
Uniting AB and putting all races in more or less one place is perfect way to cut down cost. Instead of 3 ABs they will have one (they save a lot of money on development, artwork, publishing on one hand and on the other hand they have guarantee that a lot of players will buy it). If it;s huge AB like ET book they could put hardcover preorder and hen release softcover according to demand.
Also new players will buy the book instantly as they can make many armies out of it. I don't trust GW much in terms of balance, but maybe they can playtest new rules so synergies between units will encourage players to field almost all-HE armies, WE armies etc.
Also minis - they save a lot of money also, just looking at the current range, if they release Warhammer:Elves as huge two part book + magic cards + wave of models :
- new plastic archers (to make WE-HE archers)
- new plastic cavalery (SH, Glade Riders, Ellyrian Reavers)
- new mage/hero set (to make HE,WE,DE heroes)
- swordmasters/wardancers kit.
= tons of money.
Also it will enable them to release new rules more frequently so WE or Bretonia players wouldn't have to wait decades for new ABs being a part of huge AB.
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
I really don't think Fantasy would be losing money if they had got the business model right and created a stable game in the first place.
For me the first BIG mistake was with the launch of LotR. I've heard many people argue it's a better game but effectively all they were doing is dividing any would be fantasy players into 2 competing gaming systems. What they could have done was use the LotR films as a launch pad for some renewed interest into WHFB - maybe even done some new characters/units as limited editions within the existing armies.
The second BIG mistake was 8th. If you look at the demographics of who plays WHFB and who plays 40k - the average age is higher amongst fantasy players. GW really makes its money though vs the younger audience so it decided to attempt to dumb down WHFB with 8th and took a lot of the skill out of the game - the result of this wasn't that they brought the average age down, just that they really annoyed their traditional fanbase.
What long running players want is a stable set of rules, good rules, good models and enough new releases within that framework that you have to keep rethinking. What we are given is a complete paradigm shift every year or so which isn't stable and is done primarily because GW don't want to admit they haven't yet found a balance which works. The models are great, yes and we'll buy them up no problem - but with the prices going up as steeply as they are people are looking less at buying in store and more at buying online.
Now with all these releases GW are making - we've had a higher frequency of new books throughout 8th than through any other period before - with all these new books there are costs in rewriting the rules, redesigning the models, painting them up ready for promotions, getting everything into print... etc. They amount to huge up front costs each time a new book comes out so honestly a stable system is actually good news for GW too.
I would much rather see a stable set of army books (maybe with a re-release once a decade), a stable central rulebook which requires skill and tactics in order to outplay your opponent (maybe with a re-release once a decade) and then supplements released much more frequently. These fulfill GWs need to release new models for people to buy, they fulfill our need to have a shift in our thinking every few months but it becomes a stable gaming system / a hobby / something you can plan for / something you can buy into.
For me the first BIG mistake was with the launch of LotR. I've heard many people argue it's a better game but effectively all they were doing is dividing any would be fantasy players into 2 competing gaming systems. What they could have done was use the LotR films as a launch pad for some renewed interest into WHFB - maybe even done some new characters/units as limited editions within the existing armies.
The second BIG mistake was 8th. If you look at the demographics of who plays WHFB and who plays 40k - the average age is higher amongst fantasy players. GW really makes its money though vs the younger audience so it decided to attempt to dumb down WHFB with 8th and took a lot of the skill out of the game - the result of this wasn't that they brought the average age down, just that they really annoyed their traditional fanbase.
What long running players want is a stable set of rules, good rules, good models and enough new releases within that framework that you have to keep rethinking. What we are given is a complete paradigm shift every year or so which isn't stable and is done primarily because GW don't want to admit they haven't yet found a balance which works. The models are great, yes and we'll buy them up no problem - but with the prices going up as steeply as they are people are looking less at buying in store and more at buying online.
Now with all these releases GW are making - we've had a higher frequency of new books throughout 8th than through any other period before - with all these new books there are costs in rewriting the rules, redesigning the models, painting them up ready for promotions, getting everything into print... etc. They amount to huge up front costs each time a new book comes out so honestly a stable system is actually good news for GW too.
I would much rather see a stable set of army books (maybe with a re-release once a decade), a stable central rulebook which requires skill and tactics in order to outplay your opponent (maybe with a re-release once a decade) and then supplements released much more frequently. These fulfill GWs need to release new models for people to buy, they fulfill our need to have a shift in our thinking every few months but it becomes a stable gaming system / a hobby / something you can plan for / something you can buy into.
Bring me my bow of burning gold, bring me my arrows of desire, bring me my spear O' Clouds unfold, bring me my chariot of FIRE!
Check out my rather slow caledor themed painting log and my dragon project... also my faster moving nurgle themed Warriors of Chaos themed painting log
Check out my rather slow caledor themed painting log and my dragon project... also my faster moving nurgle themed Warriors of Chaos themed painting log
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:50 pm
- Location: Sun Diego, SoCal, USA
- Contact:
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
The problem with releasing stuff once a decade lies primarily in the attrition rate. In WH40K, my love was always with the Orks. In 1999 we had a codex ... and then again in 2008 (and now in 2014). In that 9 year gap of waiting, I grew so frustrated at the way that my army just fell by the wayside that I started pursuing Space Marines (releases in '98, '05, '08, and '13) and branching into Fantasy. The space marines are the "most stable" in 40K, which is their "most stable" rules set released, yet they're releasing new versions fairly often in order to keep people hooked.Andrew_uk wrote:I really don't think Fantasy would be losing money if they had got the business model right and created a stable game in the first place.
For me the first BIG mistake was with the launch of LotR. I've heard many people argue it's a better game but effectively all they were doing is dividing any would be fantasy players into 2 competing gaming systems. What they could have done was use the LotR films as a launch pad for some renewed interest into WHFB - maybe even done some new characters/units as limited editions within the existing armies.
The second BIG mistake was 8th. If you look at the demographics of who plays WHFB and who plays 40k - the average age is higher amongst fantasy players. GW really makes its money though vs the younger audience so it decided to attempt to dumb down WHFB with 8th and took a lot of the skill out of the game - the result of this wasn't that they brought the average age down, just that they really annoyed their traditional fanbase.
What long running players want is a stable set of rules, good rules, good models and enough new releases within that framework that you have to keep rethinking. What we are given is a complete paradigm shift every year or so which isn't stable and is done primarily because GW don't want to admit they haven't yet found a balance which works. The models are great, yes and we'll buy them up no problem - but with the prices going up as steeply as they are people are looking less at buying in store and more at buying online.
Now with all these releases GW are making - we've had a higher frequency of new books throughout 8th than through any other period before - with all these new books there are costs in rewriting the rules, redesigning the models, painting them up ready for promotions, getting everything into print... etc. They amount to huge up front costs each time a new book comes out so honestly a stable system is actually good news for GW too.
I would much rather see a stable set of army books (maybe with a re-release once a decade), a stable central rulebook which requires skill and tactics in order to outplay your opponent (maybe with a re-release once a decade) and then supplements released much more frequently. These fulfill GWs need to release new models for people to buy, they fulfill our need to have a shift in our thinking every few months but it becomes a stable gaming system / a hobby / something you can plan for / something you can buy into.
As much as I love WHFB and WH40K, it's definitely not for the "stability" that GW provides. It's definitely not for the clarity of the rules, or the ease of play. I love the models, I love the world that they've created, and I can deal with the changes that come up, even if it means that I play an older version and ignore recent changes.
Screaming about how GW is "ruining" the game system/world that they created and are applying their creative license to is like getting upset because George R.R. Martin keeps killing people in Game of Thrones...
PLOG here!
High Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 12/150/1
Wood Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 18/2/43
Space Orks, done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
WH40K Imperials (BT/SoB/SW), done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
Prepare for a surprise attack!
High Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 12/150/1
Wood Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 18/2/43
Space Orks, done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
WH40K Imperials (BT/SoB/SW), done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
Prepare for a surprise attack!
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
My belief is the game has lost some £ in the last couple of years, so they will cut the production costs but let the movie roll by using the same set for more scenes(shared AB for more races)
In addition of course there will be 9th GW is a Plc, the best way to make money is a new edition (may be with similar rules )
All I'm hoping is they don't press self destruct like they did with 40k
In addition of course there will be 9th GW is a Plc, the best way to make money is a new edition (may be with similar rules )
All I'm hoping is they don't press self destruct like they did with 40k
Ian Sturgess playing high elves and wood elves since 1990 ish
Twitter @chaffmaster1
Twitter @chaffmaster1
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:50 pm
- Location: Sun Diego, SoCal, USA
- Contact:
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
Rumor from my local GW manager says 2015 will bring a lot of love for fantasy
PLOG here!
High Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 12/150/1
Wood Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 18/2/43
Space Orks, done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
WH40K Imperials (BT/SoB/SW), done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
Prepare for a surprise attack!
High Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 12/150/1
Wood Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 18/2/43
Space Orks, done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
WH40K Imperials (BT/SoB/SW), done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
Prepare for a surprise attack!
-
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:11 am
- Location: Univeristy of Glasgow
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
I've jumped ship, even the GW loyalist that I am.
I've spoken very very harshly of warmachine in the past (pre end times) but I'm giving it a go now.
A
I've spoken very very harshly of warmachine in the past (pre end times) but I'm giving it a go now.
A
For the dwarfs, there was only this. Hammerson met Grombrindal’s gaze, and the White Dwarf nodded slowly. If it must be done, let it be done well. Whether they were dead or alive, that was the only way dwarfs knew how to do anything.
And Grombrindal said "10 from the back, yeah?"
And Grombrindal said "10 from the back, yeah?"
-
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:11 am
- Location: Univeristy of Glasgow
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
But from whom? A lot of different kinds of players/hobbyists buy GW product. I just dont trust them to make any decision for the good of the game anymore.Duranthalis wrote:Rumor from my local GW manager says 2015 will bring a lot of love for fantasy
For the dwarfs, there was only this. Hammerson met Grombrindal’s gaze, and the White Dwarf nodded slowly. If it must be done, let it be done well. Whether they were dead or alive, that was the only way dwarfs knew how to do anything.
And Grombrindal said "10 from the back, yeah?"
And Grombrindal said "10 from the back, yeah?"
- Prince of Spires
- Auctor Aeternitatum
- Posts: 8249
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:07 pm
- Location: The city of Spires
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
I'm actually more curious why fantasy would need more love then it is getting now... Over the past year or two, we have regular army book releases, a whole bunch of models to go with them. And the biggest campaign / fluff update of the past several years. Love it or hate it, but The End Times is a serious amount of love fantasy is getting. 5 whole campaign books with over a 1000 pages of fluff and rules and a whole bunch of new models. Not sure what more we can ask for love wise.Lord Anathir wrote:But from whom? A lot of different kinds of players/hobbyists buy GW product. I just dont trust them to make any decision for the good of the game anymore.Duranthalis wrote:Rumor from my local GW manager says 2015 will bring a lot of love for fantasy
Rod
For Nagarythe: Come to the dark side.
PS: Bring cookies!
Check out my plog
Painting progress, done/in progress/in box: 167/33/91
Check my writing blog for stories on the Prince of Spires and other pieces of fiction.
PS: Bring cookies!
Check out my plog
Painting progress, done/in progress/in box: 167/33/91
Check my writing blog for stories on the Prince of Spires and other pieces of fiction.
-
- Pendragon
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:52 am
- Location: Cold, miserable and expensive Finland
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
"It was all a bad dream and here is what REALLY happened"Prince of Spires wrote:I'm actually more curious why fantasy would need more love then it is getting now... Over the past year or two, we have regular army book releases, a whole bunch of models to go with them. And the biggest campaign / fluff update of the past several years. Love it or hate it, but The End Times is a serious amount of love fantasy is getting. 5 whole campaign books with over a 1000 pages of fluff and rules and a whole bunch of new models. Not sure what more we can ask for love wise.Lord Anathir wrote:But from whom? A lot of different kinds of players/hobbyists buy GW product. I just dont trust them to make any decision for the good of the game anymore.Duranthalis wrote:Rumor from my local GW manager says 2015 will bring a lot of love for fantasy
Rod
Prince Deral Lionbane, head of the House of Lionbane, Lord of Lionstone and Warden of Tor Charta
Luna, try not to beat them too hard. They are proud about their pseudo-glorious past and their present nothingness, you know.
-Elmoth, about Caledorians
Luna, try not to beat them too hard. They are proud about their pseudo-glorious past and their present nothingness, you know.
-Elmoth, about Caledorians
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
I'm with you rod, fantasy for me is in a golden age. We will be lucky to see this much love again ever so savour 2013,14,15 because I think it will be 202* before it sees nearly this much attention againPrince of Spires wrote:I'm actually more curious why fantasy would need more love then it is getting now... Over the past year or two, we have regular army book releases, a whole bunch of models to go with them. And the biggest campaign / fluff update of the past several years. Love it or hate it, but The End Times is a serious amount of love fantasy is getting. 5 whole campaign books with over a 1000 pages of fluff and rules and a whole bunch of new models. Not sure what more we can ask for love wise.Lord Anathir wrote:But from whom? A lot of different kinds of players/hobbyists buy GW product. I just dont trust them to make any decision for the good of the game anymore.Duranthalis wrote:Rumor from my local GW manager says 2015 will bring a lot of love for fantasy
Rod
Ian Sturgess playing high elves and wood elves since 1990 ish
Twitter @chaffmaster1
Twitter @chaffmaster1
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:50 pm
- Location: Sun Diego, SoCal, USA
- Contact:
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
And we have yet to see updated ABs for Bretonnia, Beastmen, Skaven ... plus any new models they decide to throw towards them. Resin or plastic kit updates. He mentioned 9th edition was on the horizon ... which may be good or bad.Prince of Spires wrote:I'm actually more curious why fantasy would need more love then it is getting now... Over the past year or two, we have regular army book releases, a whole bunch of models to go with them. And the biggest campaign / fluff update of the past several years. Love it or hate it, but The End Times is a serious amount of love fantasy is getting. 5 whole campaign books with over a 1000 pages of fluff and rules and a whole bunch of new models. Not sure what more we can ask for love wise.Lord Anathir wrote:But from whom? A lot of different kinds of players/hobbyists buy GW product. I just dont trust them to make any decision for the good of the game anymore.Duranthalis wrote:Rumor from my local GW manager says 2015 will bring a lot of love for fantasy
Rod
When compared to WH40K, there's more room for expanding fantasy. The question boils down to specifics ... and we know how impossible it is to get confirmed leaks on that.
PLOG here!
High Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 12/150/1
Wood Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 18/2/43
Space Orks, done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
WH40K Imperials (BT/SoB/SW), done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
Prepare for a surprise attack!
High Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 12/150/1
Wood Elf, done/in progress/unassembled: 18/2/43
Space Orks, done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
WH40K Imperials (BT/SoB/SW), done/in progress/unassembled: Oi.
Prepare for a surprise attack!
- John Rainbow
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:47 am
- Location: PA, USA
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
QFTPrince of Spires wrote:I'm actually more curious why fantasy would need more love then it is getting now... Over the past year or two, we have regular army book releases, a whole bunch of models to go with them. And the biggest campaign / fluff update of the past several years. Love it or hate it, but The End Times is a serious amount of love fantasy is getting. 5 whole campaign books with over a 1000 pages of fluff and rules and a whole bunch of new models. Not sure what more we can ask for love wise.
Rod
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:26 pm
- Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
Maybe Teclis, with his Wind-of-Light-infused staff, just casts Super Birona's Timewarp and rewinds history to before the End Times...Prince of Spires wrote:Regarding the future of the elven armies. First off, I think it's entirely possible that 9th will retcon the entire ET fluff away and reset to pre-ET fluff. Which of course gives the option of re-releasing the ET fluff for 9th edition.
thelordcal wrote:Or he uses his big a$$ banner pole as a great weapon...
wisetiger7 wrote:That's what she said.
Asurion Whitestar wrote:I would normally delete such an off topic post, but this is just too good. Classic..!!
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
A Golden Age indeed, its been a great year and its seems there's more to come!
As for the future of elves, I think everything will stay the same - they would need to change the entire range of miniatures to put them into a real single army. Mixing different units is something that is likely happen in 9th edition (and I welcome it, for story-telling reasons) but permanently reducing the richness of the Warhammer world (one of its selling points) would be odd.
As for the future of elves, I think everything will stay the same - they would need to change the entire range of miniatures to put them into a real single army. Mixing different units is something that is likely happen in 9th edition (and I welcome it, for story-telling reasons) but permanently reducing the richness of the Warhammer world (one of its selling points) would be odd.
cheers, Lee
Elven Field Surgeon, Department of Intensive Care, Resuscitation and Necromancy
Elven Field Surgeon, Department of Intensive Care, Resuscitation and Necromancy
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
Bretonnia is gone. The Lady of the Lake was an elf goddess who is no more. The massive infighting and the undead in the Nagash book pretty much left it in ruins. They will band together with the remains of the empire.And we have yet to see updated ABs for Bretonnia, Beastmen, Skaven ... plus any new models they decide to throw towards them. Resin or plastic kit updates. He mentioned 9th edition was on the horizon ... which may be good or bad.
Beastmen, as a stand alone playable race, also gone. Dislodged by an influx of elves. They will still be part of a chaos horde, but nothing more than that.
Skaven is the next EoT book which should be out in a few weeks.
I love what they are doing with EoT. I can't wait to see where the Lizardmen land.
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
They'll land in the Wildwood, replace the forest spirits and the new combined elf army will have lizardmen servants, calling it now!
Only in the Dreaming Woods are Mortals truly free, t'was always thus and always thus will be.
Headshot wrote:Duct tape counts!!Makiwara wrote:Smiths in Nagarythe that can repair the holiest piece of armour worn by the Shadow Prince himself... 0 apparently.
Re: Future of (High) Elves army
The elves only smashed the beastmen that were attacking Athel Loren, which is the one forest in the Old World they'd never really gained a foothold in. Glottkin probably depleted their numbers in the Empire, but I expect that they're still quite strong in the forests of the Empire and northern Bretonnia. Not to mention that according to the fluff there are beastmen EVERYWHERE (except Ulthuan and possibly Lustria and the Southlands), although they take different forms and the Beastmen list may only properly apply to Old World beastmen.